The Supreme x Nike SB Dunk Low “White/Cement” is an all-time classic design from Supreme and Nike that was released in 2002. Looking to reenter the skateboarding footwear market back in the early aughts, Nike tapped into core skate shops with the lure of ultra-limited remakes of the classic Dunk model, a design that originated as a basketball shoe but eventually became popular for skateboarding. Supreme, of course, obliged, and put their spin on the silhouette by lovingly applying textured elephant print panels inspired by the iconic Air Jordan 3. A white premium leather base appears on the mid-panel with a black leather Swoosh on top. Both the perforated toe and ankle collar also use the soft white leather, as does the doubly-comfy padded tongue. Royal blue accenting appears on the inner liner while white embroidered Nike branding covers the heel. A durable white rubber midsole and a black outsole put the finishing touches on this amazing piece of footwear history.\r

SB Dunk Low Pro "Supreme - White Cement"

Reviewer Stacey Coffey

I needed to replace my Vibram Five Fingers 7 or so dedicated years. These are incredibly comfortable, and have almost as much ground feel, with just a tiny hint of cushion which actually feels quite nice. They are super light and form to the foot well.

Reviewer darnell fulgham

Very comfortable! I still have to use my SuperFeet inserts, but I'm quite satisfied with my shoes.

Reviewer David Heagy

I bought for my brother and he really liked the design. It is important to note that the Heel of the shoe makes the shoe appear to be a bit longer than it is. The heel is also slightly elevated. My brother is normally a 10 so that’s what we went with but it was tight slightly so we returned and decided to go up a whole size. Even with the size mixup, my brother was very happy with the shoe and style.

Reviewer Philip L Brach

I am a huge Chuck fan - BUT I have flat feet, and can wear them comfortably. My husband and daughter cannot. I feel like most people that wear Chucks do so because they want to make a "fashion statement" at the cost of their feet... I just need them for my flat feet - and thus every 10-12 months I order a pair of Black Chuck Taylors, works for me!

Reviewer trevstonlongworth

I normally only wear 574's from New Balance, but I purchased these because they share the same shoe last and they're similar. I can't say that I like them as well, but they're alright.

I believe the mid-soles are different, and while I think I like the 574 mid-sole better, the 565 doesn't seem bad. One thing I definitely don't like as well is the lack of mesh in the all-suede upper. They probably don't breath as well, but that's not a huge factor for me in a suede shoe. I just like the looks of the mesh/suede combo better then the all-suede shoe.

I saved my final criticism for last, because it applies to both the 565 and 574 models of "Lifestyle and Retro" shoes. These are the ones with model numbers that start with "ml". I don't like them because they appear to be the hipster version of New Balance shoes, with laces that usually match the suede. Like any good hipster shoe, they seem to be more narrow, which is antithetical to the very thing that made the 574, and probably 565, popular shoes in the first place (i.e. spacious.) Even though these are supposedly made on the same shoe last as other models in the line, they definitely don't have the advertised toe depth of the SL-2 shoe last. I've also noticed that many New Balance shoes made on the SL-2 last don't seem to be as wide as they used to be, so that issue probably isn't for the lifestyle and retro shoes alone.

Seems strange that New Balance would ruin a popular line of shoes by changing the very things that made them popular, but that's what they seem to be doing. For customers that want a more narrow 574, it seems like New Balance would just suggest the 363 or one of their models made on narrow shoe lasts. Regardless, I wish they'd leave the SL-2 shoes alone, so that customer who appreciate them can continue to do so. I've worn them for 20 years and the only thing that will stop that is if New Balance changes the shoes so much that they're not the same.

Reviewer Eliza Bowman

Surprised that I like these steel toed shoes. I work on concrete floors and my feet never hurt at the end of the day and I don't feel the steel toes.

Reviewer Christopher W Green

They were perfect. Going to get another pair as sometimes good shoes don’t stay in stock.

Reviewer Hrothgar

My grandsons fav shoe!

Reviewer Las Gayle

These are my third straight pair. Seems like they aren't as comfortable as the former two, but still good overall. Maybe just my own getting older makes them not seem as comfortable. We'll see if they are constructed as well as the former pairs which lasted me many years each.

Reviewer J C Schenk

Very comfortable shoes. They seem to get more comfortable each time you wear them. Only issue is that you will need socks that cover your heel as the back of the shoe will rub it raw.

Show29- 290(Results: 664)