Reviewer V Tinker
Great shoes. Thank you Reddit male fashion advice.
Reviewer Janel Fortier
Best running shoes I've ever owned. Exceptional cushioning.
Reviewer H Mary Cork
I normally wouldn't consider a synthetic leather shoe, because I'd never seen any that weren't awful in nearly every way possible. The only reason I considered these is because I needed shoes that fit very particular criteria and one of them was that they're synthetic. So I ordered a pair to evaluate them and the verdict is very positive.
It's not real leather, but it's close. It actually reminds me of cheap leather shoes, but without all the creasing (like comfortable Reeboks, which used loose leather for comfort). The rubber sole seems comfortable and the synthetic lining looks like it'll be easy to keep clean. It has average arch support and the insole is stuck in place, but it does offer good cushioning.
I ordered my normal sneaker size and it fits great, so I'd say the sizing is perfect (I wear a a half size larger in New Balance and sometimes with Nike). The laces are a little long, but just a little and they're nice laces.
Overall, they're nice shoes. No, they're not real leather and I didn't judge them as if they were. But there are some advantages with synthetic leather shoes and these will work great for those who understand they're not leather.
Reviewer Joseph J Kenny
I wear them all day at work. They work pretty good for me.
Reviewer K Matthias
Work Shoes! Has the comfort and the support needed to get my everyday job done.
Reviewer leola
Nothing sketcy about Sketcher. A few years ago I had some major foot trouble so since then I have been careful to protect my hoofies with ankle support and molded foot inserts. None of that matters if you have lousy shoes. I first bought a pair of Skechers Men's Afterburn Memory-Foam Lace-up Sneakers at a small box store after seeing them advertised. Best cheap shoe I ever wore. Liked them so much that I just bought a backup pair here...but I didn't have to. My older pair is still going strong. Lastability. So, if you're not some kind of shoe diva and are looking for a good ride...get yours. I like 'em!
Reviewer Michigan Mommy
Love these sturdy, wonderful shoes! Will keep buying these.
Reviewer Awesome Ninja
This shoe fits great, right out of the box. I normally wear a 3E but have had foot problems with neuropathy and hard to heal blisters on my little toe. This gives me the extra room, looks like a regular walking shoe and is comfortable at half the price of an orthopedic shoe. In fact it fits better than an orthopedic shoe because the sole isn't overly thick or heavy. It is definitely a true 6E width shoe (unlike some other companies who advertise 6E and when you order the shoe it is actually more like 3E) I would recomend this to others with similar foot problems.
Reviewer Ephraim Biblow
These are lightweight shoes. I have the 7/8 and each shoe has a weight of 7.3oz . They are Made in Vietnam, so at the current starting price of sixty-five bucks, they are quite expensive for such a simple sort of shoe. I do not show anywhere what the upper part is made of. It has a cloth look/feel to it. There is a tiny bit of stretch. One would hope that they will dry reasonably quickly if they get wet. The bottom rubber sole is non-skid. It has the Sanuk logo running all over the bottom. I like the green tag in the back, which makes it easier to slip-on. These are super casual shoes.
Reviewer Book 'Em Danno
I have the size 8. They weigh 1#, so not that lightweight, but they have a rubber sole, instead of plastic, which you find in so many of the super lightweight shoes.
Nice non-skid tread on the bottom. Canvas upper. The footbed offers very firm padding. Nice arch support. Some padding around the ankle.
I have the olive green color. Really great color indeed. They look just like the listing pictures.
Though Chrome is a U.S. brand . . . These shoes are Made in China. At the current price of over 100 bucks. . . they are quite pricey. . .But. . . The look to be quite well made, and I really like them.
Show22-
220(Results:
769)